|
A BRIEF HISTORY OF
ETHER PHYSICS
Otherwise, why would Tesla’s 100year-old theory still be classified? This concealment can be documented by a conspicuous lack of clarity and completeness in the use of such principles as the Hall effect to propel act only fluids, but solid masses, since it seems to apply to flying saucer propulsion. While I have found at least one group of patents for propulsion systems based on the Hall effect, the inventions inappropriately use the Hall effect only to pump air and electrons, not the ether, in a circuitous route only a few inches between electrodes. They missed the point entirely, which seemed to be the point of the patents, to discredit the Hall Effect as a viable application to propulsion.
Tesla’s tests of a saucer by 1915, tended to confirm his theory (along with the subsequent theories of J. J. Thomson and William Thomson), as it applied to electro-propulsion. The surface of a saucer draws in the tubes of force, which are dissolved in the conductor creating a propulsive force which is 1040 times stronger that the G-force constant, to provide the motive force. This is no more than a juxtaposition of the Hall effect as used in magneto-hydro-dynamic (“M.H.D.”) generators and pumps.
All physical bodies are ‘saturated’ with Omni Matter, and their atoms and molecules ‘fly through’ the Omni Matter like a flock of geese fly through the air. A better conception of what is happening with a flying saucer can be visualized by loosely analogizing it to a squid, which sucks water in one end and squirts it out the other like a jet, propelling the squid through the water, with the exception that the saucer experiences no internal turbulence or pressure.
1Hall Effect Manual. Beckman Instruments, Inc., Helipot Division,
Fullerton, California (1963). With saucer propulsion, the Omni Matter is stationary in respect to the universe, but dynamic in respect to the earth and matter of which the saucer is composed. The saucer moves through the rigidified, “meta-solid” ether permeating it, by pulling and pushing against it, by use of the Hall effect. By forcing the ether to move through the saucer, the saucer moves through it. This movement is obtained by inducing the tubes of electric and magnetic force to enter the saucer surface, then stripping them away to impart momentum to the conductive parts of the ship, as the Omni pass on through where they acquire new tubes after they exit the ship’s posterior.
These tubes are the source of inertia, momentum, polarity and precession, and can be turned on, off, or re-oriented instantaneously, to accelerate, decelerate, or change the saucer’s direction instantaneously. The reaction between normal solid matter and the ether with its tubes, generates and gives rise to inertia/momentum, and gravitational effects. The effects of such sudden changes on objects and people inside the saucer are canceled with the re-creation of new effects inside the conductors, as the tubes of force are dissolved in them, which insulates the ship’s contents from the effects of the tubes.
The micro-helices are of approximate atomic diameter, have pitch (angle of momentum) and angular velocity (at C, which means the saucer may only move at a maximum percent of the velocity of light). At a constant velocity, the micro-helices are without friction, according to the principle I call “The Law of Conservation of Perpetual Motion”, which means that, with the micro-helices in parallel motion, the mass of the body reacts with the ether and ZPR in such a way as to counteract any internal friction. This is the reason that, at a constant velocity, when the micro-helices resist changes in pitch, momentum, or polarity—analogous to inductance phenomena—there is no inertia (internal ‘friction’ caused by changes in orientation or pitch of the micro-helices).
If the body encounters external force which acts to slow it down, the momentum of the micro-helices tends to conserve the motion, by ‘screwing’ each of the atoms in the ‘micro-helical tubes’ forward, along their polarized, parallel axes. The normal acceleration of a body through the ether creates the electromagnetic conditions originating the momentum, and which are synthesized by saucer electro-technology, in which both momentum/inertia is switched, and the saucer turned on a dime by reorienting the electromagnetic polarity and momentum.
The high frequency, high voltage negative pulses, carried by the saucer surface in one direction, create a magnetic field across the surface at 90 degrees to the current, causing the mass of the saucer to accelerate in a direction normal to the surface (at 90 degrees to the current and magnetic field), according to the Hall effect, as the ether carriers and tubes of force are pumped through the criss-crossing electric and magnetic fields on the saucer surface, where the tubes of force are separated from the ether carriers and dissolved in the conductors, as the stripped ether carriers pass on through the saucer mass, and out the other side (as in an MHD pump), where they acquire new tubes of force.
The total electromagnetic force, which is 1040 times stronger than the G force,1 accelerates the ship at fantastic speed. All of the normal inertia/momenturn forces in space are manipulated by the saucer’s powerful electromagnetic effects, by being forcibly “eaten up” on one end, with the saucer’s movement being the “equal and opposite” effect..
These false appearances (what Einstein called “apparent effects”), are in reality a natural deception, resulting from the tendency to falsely assume that gravity is a force exerted at a distance through “empty space” between the bodies, by mysterious, unknown characteristics endemic to the bodies (in the absence of Ether Physics), when in fact, the force is exerted between the bodies and the ether existing in and between all bodies, due to the electrostatic (‘microwave’) interactance created in the interpenetrating ether rigidified by these forces.
As stated by Tesla 2,
Obviously, if the G force is so infernally weak in comparison to the electromagnetic force, it is scarce wonder that it could not really be such a “penetrating” one, where it would take an X-ray of several million volts to penetrate the two bodies. The force is exerted linearly between a smaller body and the earth, on the ether within each body, because the earth’s electric field of influence has rigidified the ether, displaced it, and upset the equilibrium in the vicinity of the two bodies, which requires the smaller body’s movement toward the center of the earth, as an equal and opposite reaction to the electrostatic forces.
The movement of a smaller body in space above the earth, and within its field of influence, upsets the equilibrium of the ether, and pumps it upward through the smaller body, due to the electrostatic forces generated in the body and the earth by their movement through space. The tubes of force are unified and drawn into the smaller body and dissolved in it, thus accelerating the body downward, which is called “gravity”, and erroneously thought to be a mysterious “attraction” between the two bodies.
The answer appears to be paradoxical, in that gravity is not really ‘penetrating' anything, but is only a reaction within and between atomic matter and the ether which does penetrate everything. While the high voltage emissions on the exterior of a saucer obviously represent a type of danger, the internal contents may be quite safe, due to adequate shielding and insulation Through common sense, injury should be avoided The deceptive apparent effects have thwarted our attempts to understand that inertia, centrifugal force, and momentum are all created by the same interaction between atomic mass, ZPR and ether within or near a mass, as the mass moves (since all mass is in motion).
On our planet, the electric field of influence dominates that of other smaller bodies in its proximity, including the moon, just as the sun’s electric field dominates that of the planets in the solar system as a whole, etc. Being within earth’s electric field means that the characteristics of the ether and ZPR have been polarized displaced rigidified to some degree, and otherwise altered and extended for some distance around it, so that on a macroscopic scale, bodies are made to behave as if they were a part of the earth’s mass, or earth’s mass system. The solar system is similar to a giant atom.
The polarity of the momentum can be synthetically oriented in any desired direction, and increased or decreased as the body’s electric field can be magnified (to mimic that of a much larger body), canceled (diminished to that of a non-existent body), or adjusted to whatever level and in whatever direction desired. In so doing, the effects of earth’s electrostatic forces are overcome by forces created from within a relatively tiny body, due to the gravitational-to-electromagnetic force conversion constant which allows it to be much stronger.
The driving force behind earth’s movement through space, is the giant current passing from the sun, through space, through the earth, and back to the sun, which imparts momentum to the earth 1, by drawing tubes of force into the earth through the Aurora Borealis (earth’s ‘brush’), where they are dissolved. Norwegian Astrophysicist Hannes Alfven recounted how Kristian Birkeland’s measurements showed that,
As Eric Lerner explained, Alfven discovered that plasma clouds moving in the magnetic field of the sun, generate electric currents which flow to the sun, after which giant currents, with trillions of amps, flow out of the sun along solar magnetic field lines, into the earth’s aurora, through the earth, back through the cloud, and back to the sun at its equator, and so forth, transferring momentum to the earth.
The axial polarity is uniformly precessing (rotating), while the radial polarity is also uniformly oscillating. Is the precessive force exerted parallel to the rotational axis, or perpendicular to it? Clearly, though we are more aware of the oscillation of the spin axis, the force of precession could just as well be exerted through the plane of rotation, as a twisting force directly related to the variations in frequency of toroidal micro-helices formed within a spinning body, due to the progressive difference in velocity between the mass near the center, and that along the outside.
It could be due to an undulating wave motion within the ocean of ether saturating all bodies, which varies in frequency and angle according to the motions of individual bodies. It is related to the spinning of the tubes of force, unified and drawn from the ether into spinning bodies, and dissolved in them, and the rate at which they transfer momentum to the spinning bodies, similar to how earth’s momentum is transferred from the currents in space.
By recreating the electromagnetic effects with an internal generator in a space ship, the ship will behave as if it were a single giant ion, having specific precessive effects peculiar to that body. If the electropulsive technology puts the atoms of the ship into a sort of “population inversion”, it is possible that the precession of the individual atoms is transferred to the entire ship.
The speculator looks for a “spinning body” when he observes precession, while the more intelligent thinker realizes that the precession of a large spinning body is more than likely due to a non-apparent electromagnetic effect having its origin in the reaction between the spinning atomic mass of the body, the unseen atomic matter and ZPR within the body, and the ether and tubes of force in the space in which it precesses. The phenomenon may not require a spinning body, but may be due to synthetically recreated electromagnetic reactions of a spinning body, on a non-spinning body.
The precessive motion can be related to the cumulative
electromagnetic effect of spinning electrons in a magnetic field,
transferred as precession to the body.
Whatever the cause of the precession, it seems endemic to and problematic with the propulsion system. If an internal spinning alternator were responsible for a saucer’s precession, it would be difficult to isolate the rest of the ship from the effects of its gyroscopic action, unless it were placed on gimbals. As such, it could be used as the “master” gyrocompass, to be conveniently coupled with the Peiltochterkompass, to provide the navigational necessities of the saucer.
If it were bolted rigidly to the airframe, the gyroscopic action would not permit the ship to be maneuvered in the manner observed, because it would resist being turned perpendicular to its rotational axis, and could only be turned around the plane of angular momentum. It would have been impossible for a saucer to turn the 90-degree vertical angles at high speed such as I observed in 1953, even using the so-called “Coanda effect”, because the angular momentum of the gyroscope would have to be entirely canceled instantaneously, and reoriented and reactivated with each such turn, and such a possibility could only be effected electromagnetically, not gyroscopically.
In applying this misconception to a little toy styrofoam ‘UFO’ which uses a model engine and propeller in its center, to suck air across the annular ring-shaped airfoil around it, to create lift as well as downward thrust, he entirely misunderstood the means by which the toy stayed aloft. In this particular toy, the styrofoam ring to which the engine mounts are attached, is allowed to counter-rotate from the torque of the engine. This causes a certain amount of the air to be drawn along with the ring, due to molecular adhesion and viscosity.
So in addition to the Bernoulli effect, the Magnus effect is added, to create further lift, by increasing the height and pressure drop in the burbles above the upper airfoil surface (I’m sorry, but it isn’t easy to bullshit me on aerodynamics). The ‘physicist’ attempted to make the case that UFOs’ work on the principle of “gyroscopic action”. The problem was, both the engine and ring were rotating on the same plane, so any “anti-gravitational” force purportedly created by the outer mass, was counteracted by the counter-rotating engine.
He had merely discarded aerodynamics completely, and by similar reasoning, he should have claimed that helicopters, airplanes, dirigibles, and gyrocopters are all “anti-gravity craft”, and in point of fact, did just that In my 1993 version of Space Aliens... (pg. 126), in passages written years before, I also made out a case for gyroscopic forces acting in “semi-defiance to gravity”, but that argument is based on the generation of excess negative charges which are sufficient to alter the gravitational reaction, but still insufficient to create “anti-gravity” as compared to mere weight loss. It is also probable that many aircraft gain extra lift by accumulation of excess negative charges.
Were the earth’s magnetic field many tunes stronger than it is, a gyroscopic device might possibly generate sufficient negative charges to defy gravity completely, but this is not the case, and the ‘physicist’ was unable to cite a single principle—either of ‘accepted’ or ‘dissident’ physics—supporting his baseless theory, though he mentioned the research of others showing anomalous weight loss, most likely caused electrostatically. If he based his claims on their findings, and nothing more however, he wasn’t entitled to call it “his discovery”. Oh! His discovery of their discoveries and my book.
He is frustrated by my preemption of material collected under Operation Paperclip in 1945, altered by the O.S.I., and recently disseminated in Europe concerning German flying saucers, which is depicted as La La Land misinformation typical of OSI liars, concocted to lure “new-age-prone” people away from the true theory. The dingy theories just don’t hold water, and the gut feeling persists that they’re the work of OSI misinformation squads. Besides, would the OSI release such information to a German group if it was true? Uhh, here you are, Hermann.... the flying saucer secrets you’ve been asking for. Be sure and tell everyone.
If he were not C.I.A, he would still be a sucker for the CIA/OSI misinformation, spread through its German collaborators, ostensibly based on misinformation—altered and screened by the O.S.I.—released through the “Hermann Goering Branch of the Knights Templars”, in Bavaria The fact that he failed to mention my book, though very familiar with it, indicated that he is possibly a former K.G.B. agent, now a witting O.S.I agent, recruited by the CIA as the Soviet system collapsed. His claim to be a “dissident scientist” is apparently based on my writings to that effect, since I called myself that in my first edition. <P STYLE="margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: |